DFM2HTML Demos: Working Layout Examples and Output Previews
This demos section shows what DFM2HTML actually produces when you build pages with its template system and visual editor. If you want to evaluate the tool before installing it, or you want reference examples of how different layout structures render in real browsers, this is where to look. The page covers output from the included template library, responsive behavior at different viewport widths, annotated markup samples, and interactive layout previews you can inspect directly. You will also find links to the template library, the liquid layout demo, specific template routes from Template 1 through Template 8, the tutorials, and the feature reference.
I have spent years watching people evaluate desktop web editors by reading feature lists. Feature lists do not tell you what the output looks like when a real browser renders it. They do not tell you whether the generated markup holds up on a phone screen or whether the navigation still works when JavaScript is delayed. Demos do. Everything on this page is produced by the same editor you can download and install on your own Windows machine.
What the Output Looks Like
DFM2HTML generates static HTML files. Not framework bundles, not JavaScript applications, not server-rendered templates that require a runtime. The output is plain HTML with accompanying CSS and, where you have added navigation menus, small self-contained JavaScript files. When you open a published DFM2HTML page in a browser, what you see is exactly what the editor previewed. There is no compilation step that might rearrange your layout and no build tool that could introduce its own bugs.
The practical consequence of this is that what you see in these demos is what you get. The pages below are not mockups. They are the actual rendered output of DFM2HTML templates opened in standard browsers. If a layout works in the demo, it will work on your hosting.
Template Layout Previews
Each of the included templates produces a distinct page structure. Browsing them in rendered form gives you a faster read on which layout fits your project than staring at wireframe thumbnails.
Template 1 produces a single column layout with a top navigation bar. This is the simplest structure in the library. It works well for documentation pages, single-topic landing pages, and content that flows linearly from top to bottom. The header spans the full width, the content sits in a centered column, and the footer anchors to the bottom. There is no sidebar competing for attention.
Template 2 adds a second column. The main content area takes roughly two-thirds of the width, with a narrower sidebar for secondary navigation, related links, or supplementary content blocks. This is the layout most people reach for when building a small business site or a documentation hub with a table of contents.
Templates 3 through Template 5 explore variations on multi-column content with different header treatments, navigation placements, and footer configurations. Template 3 introduces a wider content area with a compact utility sidebar. Template 4 moves the navigation into a left-hand rail, which works well for sites with deep page hierarchies. Template 5 is a compact brochure format where the entire page fits a tight vertical space, suited for single-page event sites or product announcements.
The frame-based templates, including Template 4 Frames and Template 7 Frames, use HTML frame structures for persistent navigation. Frames are an older technique, and modern browsers handle them differently than they did in the early 2000s. These demos let you see exactly how frame-based navigation behaves in current browsers, which is useful if you are maintaining a site that already uses frames or if the persistent-navigation model fits a specific use case like an internal documentation portal.
Template 6, Template 7, and Template 8 round out the library with layouts designed for wider viewport targets, deeper navigation structures, and sites that need more visual hierarchy in their page composition. Each template route shows the live rendered page, not a screenshot.
Responsive Behavior and Viewport Scaling
One of the questions that comes up repeatedly when people evaluate a desktop HTML editor is whether the output works on mobile screens. The short answer for DFM2HTML is that it depends on which template you choose and how you configure the content regions. The longer answer is worth walking through because it reflects how responsive design actually works in practice rather than how marketing copy describes it.
Templates built around fluid-width containers (the liquid layout approach) scale their content columns proportionally as the viewport narrows. Text reflows. Images constrained to their container width shrink gracefully. Navigation elements that use JavaScript-driven dropdown menus collapse into a usable format at narrow widths. This is not automatic magic. It is the result of the template CSS using percentage-based widths and max-width constraints rather than fixed pixel dimensions.
Templates that use fixed-width layouts or frame-based structures behave differently. At narrow viewports, a fixed-width page will trigger a horizontal scrollbar. A frame-based navigation panel will maintain its pixel width and compress the content frame. These are not defects. They are the expected behavior of those layout models. The demos make this visible so you can choose the template approach that matches your audience. If your users are on desktop workstations viewing an internal tool, a fixed-width frame layout is perfectly functional. If your users are on phones, start with a fluid template.
The layout demos on this page are worth resizing in your browser. Grab the edge of the window and drag it narrow. Watch where the columns collapse, where the navigation stacks, and where the content reflows. That ten-second test tells you more about responsive fitness than any specification document.
Annotated Markup Samples
If you want to understand what the editor generates at the code level, this section walks through the structure of the HTML output. DFM2HTML produces markup that follows a predictable pattern: a doctype declaration, a head section with metadata and stylesheet links, and a body structured with container divs that correspond to the layout regions you defined in the editor.
The generated HTML uses class names that map to the editor's component model. Navigation containers get navigation-specific classes. Content regions get content-area classes. Footer blocks get footer classes. This naming discipline matters because it means you can hand-edit the CSS after export without having to reverse-engineer which div belongs to which visual element. If you have ever inherited a site built by a WYSIWYG tool that used randomly generated class names, you know how valuable this predictability is.
The JavaScript menu files are separate from the page markup. DFM2HTML writes them as standalone script files that the HTML references via standard script tags. There are no inline event handlers scattered through the markup, no embedded script blocks wedged into the body. The separation is clean enough that you can swap out the menu script entirely without touching the page HTML. The features section documents the full set of output characteristics, including how image references, stylesheet paths, and script includes are structured.
Interactive Preview Walkthrough
The most effective way to evaluate these demos is to view them in sequence. Start with Template 1 to see the simplest output. Then move to Template 2 to see how a second column changes the page dynamics. Work through the numbered templates to understand how each layout decision, adding a sidebar, switching to a frame structure, widening the navigation rail, changes both the visual result and the underlying HTML structure.
At each template, look at three things. First, the overall page composition. Where does the navigation live? Where does the primary content sit? Where does the eye land first? Second, the responsive behavior. Narrow your browser to phone width and see what happens. Third, if you are comfortable with browser developer tools, inspect the markup. Look at the nesting depth, the class names, and the structure of the CSS. These three checks will give you a faster, more honest evaluation than any product overview page could.
For sites built with the fluid layout model, the liquid layout demo is the dedicated reference. It isolates the responsive behavior so you can see column scaling, content reflow, and navigation adaptation without the distraction of template-specific styling.
Menu and Navigation Demos
Navigation is where static site tools often stumble. A page can look great as a standalone HTML file and then fall apart the moment you need consistent menus across twenty pages. DFM2HTML addresses this with its JavaScript menu system, and the demos include working navigation examples that show dropdown behavior, hover timing, keyboard focus management, and multi-level menu structures.
The menu demos are not isolated code pens. They are embedded in full template layouts so you can see how the navigation interacts with the page content. Does a dropdown menu overlay the hero image? Does it push the content down? Does it respect the z-index layering of other positioned elements? These are the questions that matter in production, and they are only answerable by looking at the menu in its actual page context.
The tutorials section covers menu configuration in step-by-step detail, including the timing adjustments and DOM considerations that affect how menus behave when pages load slowly or when users navigate with keyboard-only input.
What the Demos Do Not Show
These demos show the published output. They do not show the editing experience. For that, you need to install the application. The visual editor, the drag-and-drop workflow, the property inspector, the template selection dialog: those are desktop application interfaces that exist inside the running program, not on a web page. The tutorials include annotated screenshots of the editor interface, and the download page links directly to the installer packages for both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows systems.
The gap between "what does the output look like" and "what does building it feel like" is real, and no demo page can fully bridge it. What these demos can do is answer the output quality question definitively. If the rendered pages here meet your structural and visual requirements, the editor that produces them is worth the install.
Next Steps
Browse the template library to see the full set of available layout starters with structural breakdowns. Walk through the step-by-step tutorials to understand the build workflow. Check the feature reference for the complete capability list. And when you are ready to try it yourself, the download page has the current installers.